SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (83)

Beta

 


 



Classifying Social Norms

Ann E. Carlson
University of California, Los Angeles - School of Law



THE JURISDYNAMICS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION: CHANGE AND THE PRAGMATIC VOICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, Jim Chen, ed., Fall 2003

Abstract:     
In this book chapter, I develop a typology of social problems at which social norms management and research might be directed. Much of the recent legal literature on law and social norms speaks of social norms generically and fail to distinguish among types of social problems. Yet a focus on different categories of social problems helps clarify important questions. How and when, for example, do social norms emerge to solve a social problem? What role can and should governments play in developing social norms as a regulatory tool? How should courts treat independently developed social norms? I suggest that the answers to these questions vary depending on at least two important characteristics: group size and the strength of economic or other interest among group members in resolving a social problem. I identify four types of social problems relevant to the development and management of social norms: "large-number, large-payoff" social problems, of which smoking and seat belt use are examples; "large-number small-payoff" collective action problems, which often involve the management of commons resources and include carpooling, recycling and blood donation; "small-group, large-payoff" problems, including Robert Ellickson's famous cattle ranchers; and a subset of small-group, large payoff problems involving commons resources, most thoroughly studied by Elinor Ostrom. Within some of these categories - small-number, large-payoff problems, for example - norms may arise internally to help resolve group problems and government may play little role in either facilitating or enforcing those norms. For other categories - large-number, large-payoff problems in particular - governments may seek to shape new norms to overcome bad behavior (or even bad norms) (drunk driving and smoking illustrate the point). The classifications, then, focus analysis on questions that may be of special import to one category of problem yet of little importance to another. By cataloguing and organizing social problems and the role social norms may play in resolving them the book chapter is meant to sharpen analysis, discussion, and debate about each particular group of problems.

Keywords: Social norms, environmental law

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: November 14, 2003 ; Last revised: February 09, 2004

Suggested Citation

Carlson, Ann E., Classifying Social Norms. THE JURISDYNAMICS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION: CHANGE AND THE PRAGMATIC VOICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, Jim Chen, ed., Fall 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=466002 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.466002


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Ann E. Carlson (Contact Author)
University of California, Los Angeles - School of Law ( email )
385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
310-206-9496 (Phone)
310-206-1234 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,798
Downloads: 256
Download Rank: 34,624
Footnotes: 83

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo6 in 0.187 seconds.