Globalisation and Sustainable Development
University of Siena Economics Working Paper No. 399
38 Pages Posted: 24 Dec 2003
Date Written: September 2003
Abstract
This paper addresses the question whether the features of the post-war process of globalisation are consistent with the social and environmental requirements of sustainable development. To this end the post-war period is articulated in two phases: the Bretton Wood period (1945-1971) and the "Washington Consensus" period (1980-2000), separated by a brief period of transition. The empirical evidence discussed in this paper suggests that the inequality between countries slightly increased throughout the period according to most measurement techniques, while inequality within OECD countries diminished in many cases in the Bretton Woods period while increased in the Washington Consensus period. On the contrary, many indexes of environmental deterioration worsened in the Bretton Woods period and improved in the Washington Consensus period although this positive tendency has recently petered out, sometimes reversed, in consequence of a widespread weakening of environmental policies. Our conclusion is that post-war globalisation cannot be considered fully sustainable in any of the two periods considered, although for different reasons. However it is argued that the process of globalisation could, and should, be made sustainable through structural interventions, some of which are briefly discussed.
Keywords: globalisation, sustainable development, inequality, Kuznets curves
JEL Classification: F02, F15, F43, O13, O15
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Income Distribution and Poverty in Selected OECD Countries
By Jean-marc Burniaux, Thai-thanh Dang, ...
-
Trends and Driving Factors in Income Distribution and Poverty in the OECD Area
-
Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries in the Second Half of the 1990s
-
Poor People in Rich Nations: The United States in Comparative Perspective
-
The Distributional Impact of Social Transfers in the European Union: Evidence from the Echp
By Christopher Heady, Theodore Mitrakos, ...
-
Relative or Absolute Poverty in the US and EU? The Battle of the Rates
By Geranda Notten and Chris De Neubourg
-
Income Distribution and Social Security in an OECD Perspective
By Koen Caminada and Kees Goudswaard
-
The Australian System of Social Protection – An Overview (Second Edition)
By Peter Whiteford and Gregory Angenent