Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=468180
 
 

Citations (20)



 
 

Footnotes (259)



 


 



Impose a Noncommercial Use Levy to Allow Free Peer-to-Peer File Sharing


Neil Weinstock Netanel


University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law


As published in Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 17, December 2003

Abstract:     
Noncommercial users of peer-to-peer systems, such as Kazaa and Gnutella, should be free to distribute and modify files as they wish. But providers of services and devices the value of which are substantially enhanced by such P2P file-swapping should be charged a statutory fee - what I term the Noncommercial Use Levy ("NUL") - set as a percentage of gross revenue. Likely candidates include Internet access, P2P software and services, computer hardware, consumer electronic devices (such as CD burners, MP3 players, and digital video recorders) used to copy, store, transmit, or perform downloaded files, and storage media (like blank CDs) used with those devices. Once collected, levy proceeds would be allocated among copyright holders in proportion to the popularity of their respective works and of user-modified version of their works, as measured by digital tracking and sampling technologies. I estimate that an average levy of some 4 percent of annual retail revenues of P2P-related goods and services would be sufficient to compensate copyright holders for the lost revenues they suffer as a result of NUL-privileged activity, at least for the next 5 years.

Following my description of the NUL and how it would operate, I consider some common criticisms that scholars have put forth regarding levies. These include the argument that the NUL would unfairly and inefficiently require low-volume users of copyright-protected material to subsidize both copyright owners and high-volume users. I then favorably compare the NUL with three proffered alternatives for resolving the P2P file sharing controversy. These include (1) "digital abandon," a regime in which the law accords authors neither proprietary control nor a right to receive remuneration for P2P uses of their work; (2) "digital lock-up," a regime in which proprietary copyright reaches full fruition as copyright holders use digital encryption to control all uses of their works; and (3) a regime of government compensation to copyright holders paid out of general tax revenues rather than a levy on P2P-related goods and services.

My proposed NUL is not a panacea. But a balance of trade-offs favors it over the alternatives.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 85

JEL Classification: K11, Z11

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 5, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Netanel, Neil Weinstock, Impose a Noncommercial Use Levy to Allow Free Peer-to-Peer File Sharing. As published in Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 17, December 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=468180 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.468180

Contact Information

Neil Weinstock Netanel (Contact Author)
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )
385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 12,930
Downloads: 1,531
Download Rank: 5,667
Citations:  20
Footnotes:  259
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. P2P and the Future of Private Copying
By Peter Yu

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.312 seconds