Was Arthur Andersen Different? An Empirical Examination of Major Accounting Firms' Audits of Large Clients
Cornell University - Law School
Jonathan R. Macey
Yale Law School
November 12, 2003
Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 04-03
Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 287
Enron and other corporate financial scandals focused attention on the accounting industry in general and on Arthur Andersen in particular. Part of the policy response to Enron, the criminal prosecution of Andersen, eliminated one of the few major audit firms capable of auditing many large, public corporations. This article explores whether Andersen's performance, as measured by frequency of financial restatements, measurably differed from that of other large auditors. Financial restatements trigger significant negative market reactions and their frequency can be viewed as a measure of accounting performance. We analyze the financial restatement activity of approximately 1,000 large, public firms from 1997 through 2001. After controlling for client size, region, time, and industry, we find no evidence that Andersen's performance significantly differed from that of other large accounting firms.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 35
JEL Classification: G30, M49, M41, K22working papers series
Date posted: November 26, 2003
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.485 seconds