The Evolution of Sherman Act Case Law: A Roadmap for Competitive Federalism
D. Bruce Johnsen
George Mason University - School of Law; PERC - Property and Environment Research Center
Moin A. Yahya
University of Alberta - Faculty of Law
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 03-54
For the first time in over six decades, recent Supreme Court decisions confirm that federal regulatory authority under the Commerce Clause truly is limited. These decisions coincide with an increasing appreciation among scholars and jurists for the concept of competitive federalism. This paper derives the implications of competitive federalism for federal antitrust jurisdiction under the Sherman Act. It provides a clear and substantively reasoned jurisdictional test based on the concept of geographic market power familiar to antitrust scholars, practitioners, and regulators in evaluating horizontal mergers. According to this test, to be subject to federal antitrust jurisdiction Sherman Act defendants must have a sufficiently large share of the geographic antitrust market that they can plausibly exercise market power that has a substantial effect on prices "in more states than one." This test reflects a natural progression in the evolution of Sherman Act and Commerce Clause jurisdiction. It resolves a number of troubling inconsistencies in the case law and also provides a useful roadmap for the direction the Court's general Commerce Clause jurisprudence might take in other areas of federal regulation.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 74
Keywords: competitive federalism, antitrust, legal evolution, geographic markets
JEL Classification: K21, K23, L11, L41, L43working papers series
Date posted: December 10, 2003
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.625 seconds