|
||||
|
||||
Private Placements and Managerial Entrenchment
Michael J. Barclay University of Rochester - Simon School (Deceased) Clifford G. Holderness Boston College - Department of Finance Dennis P. Sheehan Pennsylvania State University Journal of Corporate Finance, Forthcoming AFA 2004 San Diego Meetings Paper Abstract: We re-examine old evidence and provide new evidence on private placements of large-percentage blocks of stock. Our goal is to judge whether the prevailing hypotheses of monitoring and certification explain most private placements. Examining new evidence on events following the private placement and using a much larger sample than previous studies, our findings suggests that private placements are often made to passive investors, thereby helping management solidify their control of the firm. Although monitoring and certification may motivate some private placements, the evidence with respect to placement discounts, stock-price reactions, the post-placement activities of the purchasers, and a comparison with arms-length trades of large blocks of stock favors managerial entrenchment as the explanation for many private placements.
Keywords: G32, G34 JEL Classifications: Private Placement, Entrenchment Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: November 29, 2003 ; Last revised: January 08, 2007Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.172 seconds.