Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=471961
 


 



A 'Traditional' and 'Behavioral' Law-and-Economics Analysis of Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company


Russell B. Korobkin


UCLA School of Law


University of Hawaii Law Review, Vol. 26, p. 441, 2004
UCLA School of Law, Law & Econ. Research Paper No. 03-24

Abstract:     
Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company is a casebook favorite, taught in virtually every first-year Contract Law class. In the case, the D.C. Circuit holds that courts have the power to deny enforcement of contract terms if the terms are "unconscionable," and it remands the case to the lower court to consider whether the facts of the case meet this standard. This article, written for a session of the 2004 AALS Annual Meeting sponsored by the Contracts Section, analyzes the question that the D.C. Circuit posed to the lower court in Williams - and that Contracts teachers routinely pose to their students - from a "traditional" law-and-economics perspective, and from a "behavioral" law-and-economics perspective.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 18, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Korobkin, Russell B., A 'Traditional' and 'Behavioral' Law-and-Economics Analysis of Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company. University of Hawaii Law Review, Vol. 26, p. 441, 2004; UCLA School of Law, Law & Econ. Research Paper No. 03-24. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=471961 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.471961

Contact Information

Russell B. Korobkin (Contact Author)
UCLA School of Law ( email )
385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
310-825-1994 (Phone)
310-206-7010 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 8,939
Downloads: 1,798
Download Rank: 4,135

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.344 seconds