Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=474662
 
 

Footnotes (131)



 


 



The Mismatch Between State Power and State Capacity in Transnational Law Enforcement


Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar


Stanford Law School; Center for International Security and Cooperation

November 2003

Stanford Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 70

Abstract:     
While nation-states often possess substantial legal powers to punish transnational crimes such as money laundering, terrorism, drug trafficking, and international corruption, they frequently lack the capacity to focus such powers on the most serious offenders and threats. Power reflects a nation-state's authority to legitimately coerce individuals or organizations in an attempt to achieve some objective desired by policymakers. The hallmarks of power are expansively-worded criminal statutes that can be applied domestically or extraterritorially and extensive regulatory powers that can be imposed with minimal judicial intervention to detain people, effect forfeitures of bank accounts, freeze assets or impose civil penalties. Capacity, meanwhile, describes the nation-state's ability to detect the most serious offenders and to effectively focus its extraordinary legal powers specifically on them.

This article uses the global attack on criminal finance to highlight some of the agency problems created by the separation between power and capacity in transnational law enforcement, where the public (acting as "principal") may have trouble evaluating the work of government officials (the "agent"). "Criminal finance" refers to financial activity associated with funding or profiting from crime. The global attack on criminal finance is the most ambitious legal response to transnational crime: the conduct targeted in this attack includes both willful and also merely negligent conduct, the tools used to wage the attack include criminal penalties as well as regulation, and the predicate offenses range from drug trafficking to public corruption to terrorism.

While there are principled reasons to pursue a global attack on criminal finance, in practice the attack may demonstrate a pattern of separation between state power and state capacity. (1) The offenses most likely to be punished may often be the ones that can be most easily detected, which are rarely "serious" in any defensible sense. Interest groups may oppose regulatory policies designed to enhance detection capacity. (2) Given their incentives, policymakers in developing countries may adopt new laws and regulations without changing underlying patterns of non-enforcement against criminal financial activity. (3) Some kinds of criminal financial activity - whether impelled by intrinsic objectives or a craving for profits - will remain extraordinarily difficult to deter, because of offenders' motivations and their ability to substitute among different types of transactions. (4) Executive officials often have incentives not to make the investment in creating capacity. Instead they may prefer to use their powers to create an impression of greater security, even in the absence of the capacity to impose substantial costs on the most troubling offenders, or to detect them.

As with other challenges in transnational law enforcement, the global attack on criminal finance evinces a trend toward growth in state legal power - a trend as clear as the extent of capacity is opaque. I explain how the gap could be narrowed in specific and rare circumstances, such as when swing voters are disproportionately sophisticated, or when exogenous shocks dramatically improve the efficiency of investigative methods and technologies. Without these developments, the seductive scenario where the nation-state actually augments its capacity by expanding its legal powers will remain on the horizon, tantalizingly close - but perhaps relentlessly out of reach.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: Transnational law enforcement, terrorism, political economy,regulatory policy, international crime, law and the political process.

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 5, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Cuéllar, Mariano-Florentino, The Mismatch Between State Power and State Capacity in Transnational Law Enforcement (November 2003). Stanford Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 70. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=474662 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.474662

Contact Information

Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar (Contact Author)
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
650-723-9216 (Phone)
650-725-0253 (Fax)
Center for International Security and Cooperation ( email )
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 6,281
Downloads: 461
Download Rank: 33,945
Footnotes:  131

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.359 seconds