Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=479742
 
 

Footnotes (107)



 


 



Gore, Gibson, and Goldsmith: The Evolution of Internet Metaphors in Law and Commentary


I. Glenn Cohen


Harvard Law School

Jonathan H. Blavin


United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit


Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 16, No. 1, p. 265, Fall 2002

Abstract:     
This paper addresses the evolution of metaphors for the Internet and shows how they have constrained and determined the development of cyberlaw.

Within the law, metaphors mold the framework of discourse, determining the scope of appropriate questions about and answers to various social and legal problems. Courts and commentators employ metaphors as heuristics to generate hypotheses about the application of law to novel, unexplored domains. Metaphors structure the way lawyers conceptualize legal events, as they infiltrate, consciously and unconsciously, legal discourse. Under the classic formalist view of common law analogy as syllogism, analogical reasoning from precedent begins with the establishment of a rule behind a case or group of similar cases. Judges then apply the rule fairly mechanically to the case at hand to yield a result that is understood through the background of precedent. In contrast to figurative literary metaphors, highly structured analogical, metaphorical mappings may be used to make persuasive, logical arguments. Like all metaphors, however, legal metaphors possess a paradoxical quality, embodied in the constant tension between the legal metaphor's literal incongruence and metaphorical congruence with reality. Metaphors whose metaphorical congruence with reality is perceived as dominant, such as the "marketplace of ideas" metaphor in First Amendment jurisprudence and the "bundle of sticks" metaphor in Takings clause jurisprudence, will continue to have analogical value and will be perpetuated through judicial opinion and scholarly commentary. Conversely, legal metaphors erceived as having greater literal incongruence with reality, such as the slavery metaphor of African Americans as chattels, will lose their value and be discarded.

While metaphors aid humans in comprehending abstract concepts and legal doctrines, they also may limit human understanding by selectively highlighting various aspects of an issue while suppressing and marginalizing others. Unreflective use of metaphors can lead lawyers to take for granted the "realities" that metaphors enable. A bad metaphor can also simply lead to bad decision making. For example, Cass Sunstein argues that the "marketplace of ideas" metaphor has turned the right to free expression into a degraded form of commerce.

This paper seeks to explore the evolution of metaphorical inferences as applied to the Internet within legal commentary and judicial opinions. Three metaphors in particular will be examined: the information superhighway, cyberspace, and the Internet as "real" space. Given the Internet's ongoing evolution as an unstable and ever-changing technology, courts and commentators have faced perpetual difficulty in mapping metaphors to it. Changing social constructions of the Internet as necessitated by its evolving underlying technological architecture have supported, or conversely eroded, a particular metaphor's literal congruence with reality. The purpose of this paper to make transparent the different conceptions of the Internet courts and commentators are sub silentio employing, and the various sociological, technological, and ideological conceptions of the world that support them.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: Law, cyberspace, cyberlaw, metaphor, internet, technology

JEL Classification: K10, K11, K13, K14, K39

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 23, 2003  

Suggested Citation

Cohen, I. Glenn and Blavin, Jonathan H., Gore, Gibson, and Goldsmith: The Evolution of Internet Metaphors in Law and Commentary. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 16, No. 1, p. 265, Fall 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=479742 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.479742

Contact Information

I. Glenn Cohen (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
1525 Massachusetts Avenue
Griswold Hall 503
Cambridge, 02138
United States
Jonathan H. Blavin
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ( email )
125 South Grand Ave
Suite 506
Charlottsville, VA 22902
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 10,155
Downloads: 525
Download Rank: 28,577
Footnotes:  107

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.344 seconds