Abstract

 
 

Citations



 


 



The Democratic Political Economy of Progressive Income Taxation


John E. Roemer


Yale University - Department of Political Science

March 1997

UC Davis Working Paper #97-11

Abstract:     
Why do both left and right political parties almost always propose progressive income taxation schemes in political competition? Analysis of this problem has been hindered by the two-dimensionality of the issue space. To give parties a choice over a domain which contains both progressive and regressive policies requires an issue space that is at least two-dimensional. Nash equilibrium between two parties with (complete) preferences over two-dimensional policies fails to exist. I introduce a new equilibrium concept for political games, based on inner-party struggle. A party consists of three factions--reformists, militants, and opportunists: each faction has a complete preference order on policy space, but together they can only agree on a partial order. Inner-party unity equilibrium is defined as Nash equilibrium between two parties, each of which maximizes with respect to its quasi- order. Such equilibria exist in the two-dimensional model, and in them both parties propose progressive income taxation.

JEL Classification: D72, H20

working papers series


Date posted: April 15, 1997  

Suggested Citation

Roemer, John E., The Democratic Political Economy of Progressive Income Taxation (March 1997). UC Davis Working Paper #97-11. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=4823

Contact Information

John E. Roemer (Contact Author)
Yale University - Department of Political Science ( email )
Box 208269
New Haven, DC 06520-8269
United States
203-432-5249 (Phone)
203-432-6196 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://pantheon.yale.edu/~jer39/
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 347

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.469 seconds