Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=487483
 
 

Footnotes (88)



 


 



Assessing Judgeship Needs in the Federal Courts of Appeals: Policy Choices and Process Concerns


Arthur D. Hellman


University of Pittsburgh


Journal of Appellate Practice and Process, Vol. 5, No. 2, Fall 2003

Abstract:     
In March 2003, the Judicial Conference of the United States, the policymaking body of the federal judiciary, requested that Congress create 11 judgeships for the federal courts of appeals. The Conference based its request, in part, on a workload measure known as adjusted filings. Four courts of appeals were included in the request - but there was no mention at all of the two courts with the highest adjusted filings in the nation, the Fifth Circuit and the Eleventh Circuit. This omission raises two questions, one obvious and one that lurks below the surface. The obvious question is: Why is the Judicial Conference not seeking additional judgeships for courts which, by its own standard, would appear to need them more acutely than any other? Pursuit of this inquiry leads to the second question: Does the process used by the Judicial Conference in formulating its recommendations provide sufficient information to enable Congress to carry out its responsibility for creating judgeships when needed? Those questions are the principal focus of this article. The article examines the Judicial Conference process as well as a recent report by the General Accounting Office that expresses concerns about the standard used by the Conference in formulating its recommendations. The article concludes with suggestions for a more open process - a step that, it is believed, will provide significant benefits to the judiciary as well as to Congress.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: Judgeships, federal courts of appeals, caseload, appeals

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 19, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Hellman, Arthur D., Assessing Judgeship Needs in the Federal Courts of Appeals: Policy Choices and Process Concerns. Journal of Appellate Practice and Process, Vol. 5, No. 2, Fall 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=487483

Contact Information

Arthur D. Hellman (Contact Author)
University of Pittsburgh ( email )
3900 Forbes Ave.
Pittsburgh, PA 15260
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,663
Downloads: 144
Download Rank: 120,498
Footnotes:  88

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.328 seconds