SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (105)

Beta

 


 



The Story of Brown v. City of Oneonta: The Uncertain Meaning of Racially Discriminatory Policing under the Equal Protection Clause

R. Richard Banks
Stanford Law School


January 2004

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 81

Abstract:     
This article discusses the widely publicized case Brown v City of Oneonta, in which police officers attempted to apprehend a rape suspect described only as a young, black man by stopping and questioning every young black man in the area. The Second Circuit dismissed the equal protection claims filed by those innocent young men who were stopped and questioned. The Oneonta case raises genuinely difficult constitutional questions, and thereby illuminates the character of current equal protection doctrine.

Working Paper Series

Date posted: January 28, 2004 ; Last revised: February 23, 2004

Suggested Citation

Banks, R. Richard Richard, The Story of Brown v. City of Oneonta: The Uncertain Meaning of Racially Discriminatory Policing under the Equal Protection Clause (January 2004). Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 81. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=490842 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.490842


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

R. Richard Banks (Contact Author)
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
650-723-6591 (Phone)
650-725-4607 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,866
Downloads: 285
Download Rank: 30,756
Footnotes: 105

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo6 in 0.125 seconds.