Abstract

 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (105)



 


 



The Story of Brown v. City of Oneonta: The Uncertain Meaning of Racially Discriminatory Policing under the Equal Protection Clause


R. Richard Banks


Stanford Law School

January 2004

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 81

Abstract:     
This article discusses the widely publicized case Brown v City of Oneonta, in which police officers attempted to apprehend a rape suspect described only as a young, black man by stopping and questioning every young black man in the area. The Second Circuit dismissed the equal protection claims filed by those innocent young men who were stopped and questioned. The Oneonta case raises genuinely difficult constitutional questions, and thereby illuminates the character of current equal protection doctrine.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 28, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Banks, R. Richard Richard, The Story of Brown v. City of Oneonta: The Uncertain Meaning of Racially Discriminatory Policing under the Equal Protection Clause (January 2004). Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 81. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=490842 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.490842

Contact Information

R. Richard Banks (Contact Author)
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
650-723-6591 (Phone)
650-725-4607 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,851
Downloads: 391
Download Rank: 35,024
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  105

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.406 seconds