References (73)


Citations (3)



A Critical Guide to Bush V. Gore Scholarship

Richard L. Hasen

University of California, Irvine School of Law


Loyola-LA Public Law Research Paper No. 2004-02

This article evaluates the emerging legal and political science scholarship created in the wake of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore, the case that ended the 2000 Florida election controversy between supporters of George W. Bush and Al Gore. It surveys answers that scholars have given to four central questions: (1) Were the Supreme Court's majority or concurring opinions legally sound? (2) Was the Supreme Court's result justified, even if the legal reasoning contained in the opinions was unsound? (3) What effects, if any, will the case and the social science research it has spurred have on the development of voting rights law? (4) What does the Court's resolution of Bush v. Gore tell us about the Supreme Court as an institution?

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: 2000 presidential election, voting technology, Supreme Court, election law

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 26, 2004 ; Last revised: July 25, 2013

Suggested Citation

Hasen, Richard L., A Critical Guide to Bush V. Gore Scholarship (2004). Loyola-LA Public Law Research Paper No. 2004-02. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=491326

Contact Information

Richard L. Hasen (Contact Author)
University of California, Irvine School of Law ( email )
401 E. Peltason Drive
Suite 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-1000
United States
949 824 3072 (Phone)
949 824 0895 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://law.uci.edu/faculty/page1_r_hasen.html
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 16,182
Downloads: 1,295
Download Rank: 10,229
References:  73
Citations:  3

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds