|
||||
|
||||
The State of New York Does Exist: How the States Control Compliance with International LawJulian KuHofstra University - School of Law North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 82, p. 457, 2004 Abstract: Although most courts and commentators presume that the states disappear when it comes to foreign relations, states actually play a crucial role in fulfilling U.S. obligations under international law. In many circumstances, state governments are the only institutions responsible for carrying out treaty and customary international law obligations on behalf of the United States. Not only have states always played this role, but state control over the implementation of such obligations is likely to become even more important in the future because the implementation of many private international law and international human rights treaties is controlled by the states. This role for states in controlling compliance with international law calls into question the widely held view that exclusive federal control over foreign relations is required or desirable. This Article suggests state-controlled implementation could actually bolster the development of international law.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 74 Keywords: Federalism, international law, treaties, self execution, foreign relations JEL Classification: K33 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: February 2, 2004Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.328 seconds