Citations (2)


Footnotes (214)



The Insufficiency of Antitrust Analysis for Patent Misuse

Robin Feldman

University of California Hastings College of the Law

Hastings Law Journal, Forthcoming

Difficulties at the intersection of patent misuse and antitrust cannot be eased by requiring the application of antitrust rules to test for patent misuse. Nevertheless, in the last decade, the federal Circuit has altered the doctrine of patent misuse by taking this approach. The Federal Circuit's approach is inconsistent with legislative and judicial precedent and threatens to distort both patent and antitrust law. More importantly, using antitrust rules to test for patent misuse is inadequate because the policies underlying patent misuse are not confined to limiting the types of monopoly harms that antitrust recognizes. This article reviews the history of the doctrine of patent misuse and explores the insufficiency of antitrust analysis for promoting patent policy. Finally, the article describes Reach-Through Royalties, a form of licensing for research tools in the biotech industry, to illustrate the problems inherent in testing for patent misuse by applying antitrust law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: Intellectual property, patent, patent misuse, antitrust, reach-through royalties, reach-through, reach through royalties, reach through

JEL Classification: K00, K21, 034, 031

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 3, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Feldman, Robin, The Insufficiency of Antitrust Analysis for Patent Misuse. Hastings Law Journal, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=492443

Contact Information

Robin Feldman (Contact Author)
University of California Hastings College of the Law ( email )
200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,670
Downloads: 557
Download Rank: 34,243
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  214
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Anticompetitive Settlement of Intellectual Property Disputes
By Herbert Hovenkamp, Mark Janis, ...

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds