Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=502362
 
 

Citations (6)



 
 

Footnotes (36)



 


 



The Condominium v. Cooperative Puzzle: An Empirical Analysis of Housing in New York City


Michael H. Schill


University of Chicago - Law School

Ioan Voicu


New York University School of Law; NYU's Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy

Jonathan Miller


Miller Samuel Inc.

February 10, 2004

NYU, Law & Economics Research Paper No. 04-003; NYU, Public Law Research Paper No. 75; and NYU Ctr for Real Estate & Urban Policy Paper No. 2004-1

Abstract:     
One of the enduring puzzles of New York City's housing market, is the persistence of the housing cooperative, despite the prevailing wisdom that condominiums are more valuable than cooperatives. In this article, we examine the theoretical advantages and disadvantages of cooperatives and condominiums, and apply these theoretical insights to empirically test whether there is a price premium attributable to condominium housing. We then use our findings to speculate as to why the cooperative form remains dominant in New York City and whether its dominance is likely to continue in the future. The empirical analysis is based on hedonic models of house values and uses rich data on apartments sold in New York City between 1984 and 2002.

In most instances, theory suggests several reasons why the condominium may be a more efficient and desirable housing form than the cooperative. Unlike the case of cooperatives, condominium owners do not share liability on mortgage debt, they are free to transfer their apartments to whomever they choose, they are subject to fewer rules than cooperative apartment owners and, correspondingly, they need spend less time in internal governance. Our empirical findings confirm the theoretical prediction that legal form does indeed matter. With one important exception, condominium apartments are significantly more valuable than comparable cooperative apartments. The one exception suggests that for some owners, the benefits of restriction and exclusivity that the cooperative form offers may be utility-maximizing. Therefore, we speculate that, except for the segment of the market that seeks a socially exclusive residential environment, the continued dominance of cooperative housing in New York City is probably more a function of legal impediments to conversion and transaction costs than the economic advantages offered by the form.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Keywords: Real estate, housing, condominiums, cooperatives

JEL Classification: K11, R00, R31

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 12, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Schill, Michael H. and Voicu, Ioan and Miller, Jonathan, The Condominium v. Cooperative Puzzle: An Empirical Analysis of Housing in New York City (February 10, 2004). NYU, Law & Economics Research Paper No. 04-003; NYU, Public Law Research Paper No. 75; and NYU Ctr for Real Estate & Urban Policy Paper No. 2004-1. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=502362 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.502362

Contact Information

Michael H. Schill (Contact Author)
University of Chicago - Law School ( email )
1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
773-702-9495 (Phone)
Ioan Voicu
New York University School of Law ( email )
40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
NYU's Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy ( email )
New York, NY 10012
United States
Jonathan Miller
Miller Samuel Inc. ( email )
21 West 38th Street, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10018
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,448
Downloads: 451
Download Rank: 33,188
Citations:  6
Footnotes:  36

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.719 seconds