Disabilities, Enhancements, and the Meanings of Sports
Henry T. Greely
Stanford Law School
Stanford Law & Policy Review, Vol. 15, No. 2, Spring 2004
What, if anything, do organized sports owe individuals who are seeking to be the best [they] can possibly be? This article explores that question in two dimensions. First, it examines the consequences for organized sports of statutory rights given to persons with disabilities. It then looks at the legal and policy issues raised by individuals' attempts to enhance their athletic success in various ways. It then urges that neither the questions posed by disability nor those posed by enhancement can be answered without addressing deeper questions about the various meanings we put on fair competition in sports. As to disability, it concludes that the application of the Americans with Disabilities Act to sports in the Casey Martin case was generally appropriate, although the Supreme Court's decision does leave open some hard questions. As to enhancement, it questions whether a strong case can be made for singling out for negative treatment performance-enhancing drugs from among all the ways in which top athletes enhance themselves. It suggests we may want to think harder about other ways to deal with such pharmacological enhancements.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 56Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 13, 2004
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.719 seconds