SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Citations (1)

Beta

 
 

Footnotes (302)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Computer Programming and the Automation of Invention: A Case for Software Patent Reform

Robert Plotkin
Boston University - School of Law



UCLA Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 7, 2003

Abstract:     
Software differs from other electromechanical technologies because of the unique process by which software programs are invented. In particular, software developers create novel executable software programs, which are components of a computer, by conceiving of and specifying such programs solely in terms of their logical structure. As a result, computer programmers need not engage in physical structural design, which historically has been necessary to invent electromechanical devices. This feature of software development violates the assumptions of patent law, which generally requires that electromechanical inventions be conceived, described, and claimed in terms of their physical structure. Patent law should allow software to be conceived, described, and claimed in terms of its logical structure to produce a better fit between patent law and software.

Keywords: Law, patent, intellectual property, software

JEL Classifications: K11, O34

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: April 05, 2005 ; Last revised: April 11, 2005

Suggested Citation

Plotkin, Robert, Computer Programming and the Automation of Invention: A Case for Software Patent Reform. UCLA Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 7, 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=503822


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Robert Plotkin (Contact Author)
Boston University - School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,993
Downloads: 302
Download Rank: 27,256
Citations: 1
Footnotes: 302

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo4 in 0.109 seconds.