|
||||
|
||||
A Delegated Agent Asset-pricing modelBradford CornellCalifornia Institute of Technology Richard RollUniversity of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Finance Area February 2004 UCLA Anderson School of Management, Finance Working Papers Series 3-04 Abstract: Asset pricing theory has traditionally made predictions about risk and return, but has been silent on the actual process of investment. Many if not most investors delegate major investment decisions to professionals, to investment managers and financial advisors. This suggests that the instructions given by investors to their delegated agents and the compensation of those agents might be important determinants of capital market equilibrium. In the extreme when all investment decisions are delegated, the preferences and beliefs of individuals would be completely superseded by the objective functions of agent/managers. Agency theory holds that such objective functions cannot be isomorphic to principals' preferences and beliefs, which suggests that asset pricing could differ fundamentally from that predicted by existing theory. A simple example of the difference is provided in this paper based active asset management relative to a benchmark index, a common objective function in practice but with no grounding in traditional theory. With the growing preponderance of delegated investing, future asset pricing theory will not only have to describe risk and return but, to be complete, must also be able to explain the observed objective functions used by professional managers.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 27 Keywords: asset pricing JEL Classification: G12 working papers seriesDate posted: July 18, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.734 seconds