|
||||
|
||||
External Churning and Internal Flexibility: Evidence on the Functional Flexibility and Core-Periphery Hypotheses
Peter Cappelli University of Pennsylvania Wharton School - Center for Human Resources; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) David Neumark University of California, Irvine - Department of Economics; Public Policy Institute of California; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 148-182, January 2004 Abstract: Functionally flexible systems for organizing work may reduce job instability and insecurity by reducing employers' reliance on job cuts or contingent work to respond to changes in their environments. Related arguments hypothesize that contingent work allows firms to adjust labor while "buffering" their core of permanent workers from job instability. We find evidence that internally flexible work systems are associated with reduced involuntary and voluntary turnover in manufacturing but that contingent work and involuntary turnover of the permanent workforce are positively related regardless of sector, in contrast to the prediction of the core-periphery hypothesis. Accepted Paper Series Date posted: March 23, 2004 ; Last revised: April 07, 2004Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.125 seconds.