Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=515682
 
 

Footnotes (265)



 


 



Enron.org: Why Sarbanes-Oxley Will Not Ensure Comprehensive Nonprofit Accountability


Dana Brakman Reiser


Brooklyn Law School

March 2004

Brooklyn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 6

Abstract:     
In the name of avoiding Enron-like scandals among nonprofit organizations, several state attorneys general (AGs) have proposed nonprofit reform legislation that draws closely on the language and principles of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. This article explores these important and as yet unexamined nonprofit reform efforts, and articulates the perils of perceiving them as panaceas. It begins by deconstructing the comprehensive concept of nonprofit accountability into its financial, mission, and organizational accountability components. Then, it interprets AGs' statutory mandates, explores their institutional competencies, and candidly examines their political incentives, in order to assess and anticipate AGs' nonprofit enforcement agendas. This analysis concludes that AGs consistently will prioritize financial issues, and will fail to address vital issues of mission creep and lapses in nonprofit governance. Next, the article explores various examples of activist AGs' nonprofit enforcement efforts to demonstrate that AGs actually have prioritized financial concerns. Its brief review of AGs' recent use of traditional enforcement tools, like fiduciary litigation and charitable solicitation regulation, reveals a consistent focus on financial issues. Likewise, the article's extensive evaluation of AGs' nonprofit Sarbanes-Oxley proposals demonstrates their emphasis on financial accountability, and corresponding neglect of mission and organizational concerns. Since even today's most innovative and activist AGs have not and will not comprehensively police nonprofit accountability, the article concludes by offering preliminary thoughts on complements to AG enforcement. In particular, it explores possibilities for nonprofit self-regulation to bridge the gap in mission and organizational accountability enforcement, and thereby help protect nonprofits' vital role in contemporary society.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 65

Keywords: nonprofit, corporations, governance, charity

JEL Classification: G39, K22

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 11, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Brakman Reiser, Dana, Enron.org: Why Sarbanes-Oxley Will Not Ensure Comprehensive Nonprofit Accountability (March 2004). Brooklyn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 6. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=515682 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.515682

Contact Information

Dana Brakman Reiser (Contact Author)
Brooklyn Law School ( email )
250 Joralemon Street, Rm. 814
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States
718-780-0396 (Phone)
718-780-0376 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,733
Downloads: 658
Download Rank: 20,716
Footnotes:  265

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.297 seconds