Is Deposit Insurance a Good Thing, and if so, Who Should Pay for It?
Alan D. Morrison
University of Oxford - Said Business School; University of Oxford - Merton College; University of Oxford - Said Business School
Harvard Business School - Finance Unit; Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)
Oxford Financial Research Centre Working Paper No. 2004-FE-08
EFA 2006 Zurich Meetings
Deposit insurance schemes are increasingly being adopted around the world and yet our understanding of their design and consequences is in its infancy. In this paper we provide a new rationale for the provision of deposit insurance based around the idea that bankers have valuable but costly monitoring skills. The banking sector exhibits both adverse selection and moral hazard and so the social benefits of bank monitoring are shared between depositors and their banks. Therefore too few deposits are made in equilibrium. Deposit insurance can correct this market failure. Contrary to received opinion, we find that deposit insurance should be funded not by bankers or depositors but through general taxation. We also show that the optimal level of deposit insurance should vary inversely with the quality of the banking system.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 27
Keywords: deposit insurance, bank regulation, adverse selection, moral hazard
JEL Classification: G21, G28
Date posted: March 30, 2004
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds