Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=521822
 
 

Citations



 


 



Judges and Ideology: Public and Academic Debates about Statistical Measures


Gregory C. Sisk


University of St. Thomas School of Law (Minnesota)

Michael Heise


Cornell Law School

March 2004

Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 04-032

Abstract:     
Scholars who use empirical methods to study the behavior of judges long have labored in relative obscurity, unknown outside of academic circles (and indeed they only recently have emerged into the mainstream of the legal academy). However, the seclusion of the ivory tower has been breached as public attention has become increasingly focused upon studies that suggest the influence of ideological or partisan variables upon the outcomes of court cases. Over the last few years, the statistical work of scholars on judicial decisionmaking has provoked controversy in the wider legal community and has been enlisted by one side of the ongoing debate in the political arena about appointment of federal judges. In this Article, we begin by highlighting each of these episodes in which empirical legal scholarship on judicial decisionmaking emerged from obscurity to become the subject of disputation in a larger societal or academic arena, two disputes that unfolded before the public eye and another which was played out at the highest level of legal academic discourse. We outline each controversy; identify the prominent political, judicial, and academic players that initiated or were drawn into the debate; briefly describe the empirical research involved; and summarize the opposing arguments concerning the implications of the research for public policy or the substance of the academic debate. Next, through separate accounts pertinent to each venue/subject - the public/policy versus the academic/methodological - we submit new evidence for consideration, which is drawn from our own continuing research on decisionmaking in the lower federal courts. We report the results of our comprehensive empirical study of religious freedom decisions in the federal district courts and courts of appeals, the most extensive and multi-faceted study of such decisions to date, with special focus here upon variables that attempt to quantify the anticipated ideological leanings of judges. As frequently but not invariably found in other studies, ideology emerged as significant in certain aspects of our study, but not in a ubiquitous or dominating manner.

Keywords: judges, ideology, judicial decisionmaking, empirical

working papers series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: March 30, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Sisk, Gregory C. and Heise, Michael, Judges and Ideology: Public and Academic Debates about Statistical Measures (March 2004). Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 04-032. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=521822

Contact Information

Gregory C. Sisk
University of St. Thomas School of Law (Minnesota) ( email )
MSL 400, 1000 La Salle Avenue
Minneapolis, MN Minnesota 55403-2005
United States
651-962-4892 (Phone)

Michael Heise (Contact Author)
Cornell Law School ( email )
310 Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853-4901
United States
607-255-0069 (Phone)
607-255-7193 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 696

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.469 seconds