Abstract

 
 

References (12)



 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



Earnings Management: A Methodological Review of the Distribution of Reported Earnings Approach


David Holland


affiliation not provided to SSRN

January 1, 2004


Abstract:     
Hayn (1995) first introduced the concept of the pooled, cross-sectional distribution of reported earnings approach to assess whether there is any evidence of earnings management. This approach was further developed by Burgstahler and Dichev (1997) and since then, a substantial volume of new research has applied this methodology to alternative earnings thresholds and in different operational settings. This paper evaluates some aspects of the methodology and its applicability to different settings and contexts. This paper shows that the choice of interval width is a critical consideration in the distribution of reported earnings approach and, therefore, results should include a variety of interval widths to illustrate the robustness of findings. It also demonstrates that when the peak of the distribution falls adjacent to a threshold, the distribution of reported earnings approach will not provide statistically reliable and robust results. Finally, it concludes that the assumption of symmetry used by Burgstahler and Dichev (1997) to test for the prevalence of earnings management can only be justified where there is a known symmetrical distribution for the data in question.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: Earnings management, earnings benchmarks, distribution of reported earnings

JEL Classification: M41, M43, L14, C89

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 7, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Holland, David, Earnings Management: A Methodological Review of the Distribution of Reported Earnings Approach (January 1, 2004). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=525242 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.525242

Contact Information

David Holland (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,228
Downloads: 865
Download Rank: 11,664
References:  12
Citations:  2

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.344 seconds