Masking Redistribution (or its Absence)
University of Pennsylvania - Department of Psychology
Edward J. McCaffery
USC Gould School of Law
July 16, 2004
U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper 04-09; USC Law School, Olin Research Paper No. 04-5; and USC CLEO Research Paper No. C04-1
Research has shown that people vary widely in their support or opposition to progressive taxation. We argue here that the perception of progressiveness itself is affected by the nature of the tax system and by the way it is framed, or presented. Experiments conducted over the World-Wide Web and using within-subject design demonstrate that subjects suffer from a range of heuristics and biases in understanding and supporting progressive or redistributive taxation. After reviewing some prior results, we report four new studies. Two of them indicate that people do not sufficiently appreciate the reduction of progressiveness that results from the use of tax deductions to partly reimburse private expenditures. The other two indicate that people do not fully appreciate the reduction in progressiveness that results from cuts in government services.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 30working papers series
Date posted: April 7, 2004
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.438 seconds