|
||||
|
||||
Asian Crises: Theory, Evidence, Warning-signals
Jerome L. Stein Brown University - Division of Applied Mathematics; CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research) Guay Lim University of Melbourne - Faculty of Economics and Commerce March 2004 CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1159 Abstract: In July 1997, the economies of East Asia became embroiled in one of the worst financial crises of the postwar period. Yet, prior to the crisis, these economies were seen as models of economic growth experiencing sustained growth rates that exceeded those earlier thought unattainable. Why did the market not anticipate the crises? To this end, we review the Asian financial crisis from two related perspectives - whether the crisis was precipitated by a failure of the real exchange rate to be aligned with its fundamental determinants and/or whether the crisis was precipitated by a divergence of the foreign debt from its optimal path. The first perspective is based on a coherent theory of the equilibrium real exchange rate - the NATREX model - that shows how "misalignments" lead to currency crises. The second perspective is based on a model of optimal foreign debt ratio - derived from stochastic optimal control - which shows why "divergences" lead to debt crises. The important point here is that these models suggest important variables which may serve as warning signals to predict crises.
Keywords: asian crises, optimal debt, equilibrium exchange rates, NATREX, stochastic optimal control, warning signals of crises, exchange rate misalignment JEL Classifications: F3, F31, F32, F34, F4 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: April 13, 2004 ; Last revised: August 11, 2004Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apolloc 6 in 0.281 seconds.