Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=530284
 
 

References (21)



 
 

Citations (5)



 


 



Post-Siliconix Freeze-Outs: Theory, Evidence & Policy


Guhan Subramanian


Harvard Business School

April 2004

Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 472; Harvard PON Working Paper

Abstract:     
At approximately the same time that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act increased the costs associated with being a public company, important Delaware case law created a difference in the standard of judicial review for the two basic methods of freezing out minority shareholders. While a freeze-out executed as a statutory merger is subject to stringent entire fairness review, the Delaware Chancery Court held in In re Siliconix Shareholders' Litigation that a freeze-out executed as a tender offer is not. This paper presents the first systematic empirical evidence on post-Siliconix freeze-outs. Using a new database of all freeze-outs executed during the current doctrinal regime, I find that a controlling shareholder pays less to the minority shareholders, on average, when it uses a tender offer compared to a merger. This difference between tender offers and mergers seems to increase with the size of the controller's pre-deal stake. These findings introduce a puzzle as to why more than two-thirds of post-Siliconix freeze-outs still proceed through the traditional merger route. I present some evidence that controllers are more likely to choose a merger when they hold a relatively small controlling stake, in order to avoid supermajority approval from the minority that would be required in a tender offer. I also present some evidence that a freeze-out is more likely to be executed as a tender offer when the controller's outside counsel has substantial M&A experience. These findings bolster arguments for convergence in judicial standards of review between tender offer and merger freeze-outs, and provide guidance on how such convergence might best be achieved.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: Freeze-outs, going private, Siliconix, parent-subsidiary mergers

JEL Classification: G30, G34, K22

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 27, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Subramanian, Guhan, Post-Siliconix Freeze-Outs: Theory, Evidence & Policy (April 2004). Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 472; Harvard PON Working Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=530284 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.530284

Contact Information

Guhan Subramanian (Contact Author)
Harvard Business School ( email )
Soldiers Field Road
Morgan 270C
Boston, MA 02163
United States
617-495-9784 (Phone)
617-496-7379 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,996
Downloads: 914
Download Rank: 12,682
References:  21
Citations:  5

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.250 seconds