Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=531582
 
 

Footnotes (202)



 


 



The Clothes Have No Emperor, Or, Cabining the Commerce Clause


John T. Valauri


Northern Kentucky University - Salmon P. Chase College of Law


San Diego Law Review, Vol. 41, 2004

Abstract:     
According to received opinion in constitutional criticism, the Supreme Court's current commerce power doctrine, as formulated in its Lopez and Morrison decisions, is a mess. This doctrine, say the critics, is inconsistent both with other post-New Deal case law and with John Marshall's classic doctrine set forth in cases like McCulloch and Gibbons. It resembles nothing so much as the doctrine of pre-New Deal cases like Hammer v. Dagenhart, the Lochner of commerce cases. As a result, these opponents of the Court also reject the theory of federalism which accompanies, and arguably motivates, the Court's commerce power doctrine.

But received opinion here is wrong. The Court's current commerce power doctrine is consistent with both other post-New Deal cases and with Marshall's universally praised opinions, while it is no kin to Hammer and its like. How can all these commentators be so wrong? Mainly because they and our legal culture have forgotten the doctrine of implied congressional powers formulated by Hamilton, Marshall (especially in McCulloch), and Story (as well as the notion of federalism that goes along with it). Under this doctrine, congressional power over the channels and instrumentalities of interstate commerce is plenary, while the power under the substantial effects test is only telic (means-ends limited). In this way, plenary congressional commerce power is vindicated, yet federalism is maintained. And the Court's current commerce power doctrine finds a better justification from some old federalists.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 37

Keywords: commerce clause, federalism, constitutional law, necessary and proper clause

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 16, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Valauri, John T., The Clothes Have No Emperor, Or, Cabining the Commerce Clause. San Diego Law Review, Vol. 41, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=531582

Contact Information

John T. Valauri (Contact Author)
Northern Kentucky University - Salmon P. Chase College of Law ( email )
Nunn Hall
Highland Heights, KY 41099
United States
859-572-5387 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,026
Downloads: 77
Download Rank: 186,640
Footnotes:  202

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.219 seconds