Should Liability Be Based on the Harm to the Victim or the Gain to the Injurer?
A. Mitchell Polinsky
Stanford Law School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Harvard Law School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
JOURNAL OF LAW, ECONOMICS, AND ORGANIZATION, Vol 10 No 2, 1994
Should the level of liability imposed on an injurer be based on the harm he caused or instead on the gain he obtained from engaging in the harmful act? There is a strong reason to favor liability based on harm rather than gain when account is taken of the possibility of legal error. Notably, even a small underestimate of gain can lead an injurer to commit a harmful act when the harm greatly exceeds his gain, resulting in a large social loss. In contrast, a comparable error in the estimate of harm will not lead an injurer to engage in the harmful act when the harm significantly exceeds his gain. The general superiority of harm-based liability holds under the rules of negligence an strict liability and regardless of whether potential injurers know the error that will be made.
JEL Classification: K14, K41Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 4, 2000
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.265 seconds