Footnotes (659)



Criminal Law in a Post-Freudian World

Deborah W. Denno

Fordham University School of Law

University of Illinois Law Review, pp. 601-774, 2005
Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 48

Freudian psychoanalytic theory has greatly influenced the modern definition of criminal culpability. Indeed, much of the language of key criminal statutes, cases, and psychiatric testimony is framed by psychoanalytic concepts. This impact is particularly evident in the Model Penal Code's mens rea provisions and defenses, which were developed in the 1950s and 1960s, a time of Freudian reign in the United States. For contemporary criminal law, however, this degree of psychoanalytic presence is troublesome. Freudian theory is difficult to apply to group conflicts and legal situations, and the theory emphasizes unconscious (rather than conscious) thoughts. The rising new science of consciousness and conscious will provides continuity with Freudian theory. Yet, in contrast to Freudian principles, this new science offers criminal law a means of enlightening existing mens rea doctrine with advanced discoveries that more easily comport with human behavior and evidentiary standards. The results of this author's unprecedented statewide study of criminal jury instructions also suggest that courts are wrong to distort or reduce the significance of mens rea in the ways juries interpret criminal cases. This article concludes that current consciousness research provides a sound vehicle for criminal law doctrine to return the law's focus to the defendant's mental state, thereby retaining the moral insights, but not the muddle, that Freudian theory originally contributed.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 175

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 3, 2005  

Suggested Citation

Denno, Deborah W., Criminal Law in a Post-Freudian World. University of Illinois Law Review, pp. 601-774, 2005; Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 48. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=544962

Contact Information

Deborah W. Denno (Contact Author)
Fordham University School of Law ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
212-636-6868 (Phone)
212-636-6899 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,961
Downloads: 315
Download Rank: 62,260
Footnotes:  659

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.610 seconds