Fees Paid to Audit Firms, Accrual Choices and Corporate Governance
David F. Larcker
Stanford University - Graduate School of Business
Scott A. Richardson
London Business School
Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 42, No. 3, June 2004
We examine the relation between the fees paid to auditors for audit and non-audit services and the choice of accrual measures for a large sample of firms. Using our pooled sample, we find that the ratio of non-audit fees to total fees has a positive relation with the absolute value of accruals similar to Frankel et al. (2002). However, using latent class mixture models to identify clusters of firms with a homogenous regression structure reveals that this positive association only occurs for about 8.5 percent of the sample. In contrast to the fee ratio results, we find consistent evidence of a negative relation between the level of fees (both audit and non-audit) paid to auditors and accruals (i.e., higher fees are associated with smaller accruals). The latent class analysis also indicates that this negative relation is strongest for client firms with weak governance. Overall, our results are most consistent with auditor behavior being constrained by the reputation effects associated with allowing clients to engage in unusual accrual choices.
Keywords: Audit fees, auditor independence, accruals, corporate governance
JEL Classification: M41, M43, M49, G34, L14Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 12, 2004
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.359 seconds