|
||||
|
||||
A General Approach to Integrated Risk Management with Skewed, Fat-Tailed Risk
Joshua V. Rosenberg Federal Reserve Bank of New York Til Schuermann Federal Reserve Bank of New York May 2004 FRB of New York Staff Report No. 185 Abstract: The goal of integrated risk management in a financial institution is to measure and manage risk and capital across a range of diverse business activities. This requires an approach for aggregating risk types (market, credit, and operational) whose distributional shapes vary considerably. In this paper, we construct the joint risk distribution for a typical large, internationally active bank using the method of copulas. This technique allows us to incorporate realistic marginal distributions that capture some of the essential empirical features of these risks like skewness and fat-tails while allowing for a rich dependence structure. We explore the impact of business mix and inter-risk correlations on total risk, whether measured by value-at-risk or expected shortfall. We find that given a risk type, total risk is more sensitive to differences in business mix or risk weights than to differences in inter-risk correlations. There is a complex relationship between volatility and fat-tails in determining the total risk: depending on the setting, they either offset or reinforce each other. The choice of copula (normal versus Student-t), which determines the level of tail dependence, has a more modest effect on risk. We then compare the copula-based method with several conventional approaches to computing risk, each of which may be thought of as an approximation. One easily implemented approximation, which uses empirical correlations and quantile estimates, tracks the copula approach surprisingly well. In contrast, the additive approximation, which assumes no diversification benefit, typically overestimates risk by about 30-40%.
Keywords: Market risk, credit risk, operational risk, risk diversification, copula JEL Classifications: G10, G20, G28, C16 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: May 14, 2004 ; Last revised: May 03, 2005Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apolloa 6 in 0.437 seconds.