Climate Change, Cultural Transformation, and Comprehensive Rationality
Douglas A. Kysar
Yale University - Law School
Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, Vol. 31, pp. 1-35, 2004
Economic cost-benefit analysis aims to evaluate regulatory proposals by identifying, monetizing, and comparing the proposals' expected positive and negative consequences. The methodology has been received critically in the area of environmental, health, and safety regulation, where scientific uncertainty, difficulties of valuation, and uncommonly long time horizons are said to render cost-benefit analysis especially problematic. This Essay reviews such criticisms through a discussion of the use cost-benefit analysis in the particular context of climate change policymaking. In this context, generic criticisms of cost-benefit analysis in the environmental, health, and safety area become even more pronounced, raising significant doubt about the methodology's philosophical and practical appropriateness as a guide for climate change policymaking.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 36
Keywords: Environmental law, environmental science, cost-benefit analysis, risk regulation, climate change, global warming
JEL Classification: K0, Q0, K32Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: May 16, 2004
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.672 seconds