SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Citations (8)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Venture Capital Limited Partnership Agreements: Understanding Compensation Arrangements

Kate Litvak
Northwestern University - School of Law; Northwestern University - Department of Finance


June 1, 2004

U of Texas Law and Economics Research Paper No. 29
Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 254

Abstract:     
This paper uses a hand-collected dataset of venture capital partnership agreements to study venture capitalists' compensation. Several new findings emerge. First, VC compensation consists of three elements, not two (management fee and carried interest), as commonly believed. The third element is the value of distribution rules that specify when during the fund's life VCs receive distributions. These rules often generate an interest free loan to VCs from limited partners. A shift from the most popular distribution rule to the second most-popular rule can affect VC compensation as much or more than common variations in management fee (from 2% to 2.5% of committed capital) or carry percentage (from 20% to 25% of fund profit). Second, VC compensation is often more complex and manipulable than it could have been. However, more complex management fee provisions predict lower total compensation, thus complexity is not used to camouflage high pay. Third, common proxies for VC quality predict higher levels of the more transparent forms of VC compensation (carried interest and management fee), but do not predict the levels of opaque compensation (interest-free loan). Fourth, long-term VC performance predicts fund size (which in turn predicts VC pay controlling for fund size), but recent performance does not predict changes in fund size. Finally, VC compensation is less performance-based than commonly believed: for vintage years between 1986 and 1997 (most recent years for fully-liquidated funds), about half of total VC compensation comes from the nonrisky management fee. On average, a 1% increase in fund returns predicts a 0.47% increase in total VC compensation; this pay-performance elasticity is similar to that of public company CEOs during the same years.

Keywords: venture capital, entreprenerial finance, partnership agreement, compensation, management fee, carried interest

JEL Classifications: J30, J31, J33, J40, J41, J44, K00, K12, L14, L84, M13

Working Paper Series

Date posted: June 07, 2004 ; Last revised: November 06, 2008

Suggested Citation

Litvak, Kate, Venture Capital Limited Partnership Agreements: Understanding Compensation Arrangements (June 1, 2004). U of Texas Law and Economics Research Paper No. 29; Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 254. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=555626 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.555626


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Kate Litvak (Contact Author)
Northwestern University - School of Law ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
Northwestern University - Department of Finance ( email )
2001 Sheridan Road
Evanston, IL 60208
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 10,595
Downloads: 2,203
Download Rank: 1,174
Citations: 8
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.125 seconds.