Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=555926
 
 

Footnotes (197)



 


 



Why is Congress Still Regulating Noncommercial Activity?


Alex Kreit


Thomas Jefferson School of Law


Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 28

Abstract:     
This essay considers the Commerce Clause broader regulatory scheme doctrine. Lower courts have adopted this doctrine, mentioned twice in United States v. Lopez, to uphold a wide range of federal noncommercial regulation from statutes that cover drug, gun, and child pornography possession to environmental and endangered species regulations. As a result, Lopez and United States v. Morrison thus far have not turned out to be the landmark cases they first seemed. Despite the central role the broader scheme doctrine has played in defining post-Lopez Commerce Clause power in lower court decisions, commentators surprisingly have overlooked it almost entirely. The one academic article to focus on the doctrine correctly argues that it creates perverse legislative incentives for Congress but makes only that limited contribution. As broader scheme cases work their way toward the Supreme Court, the oversight is especially significant.

This essay provides the first thorough examination of the broader scheme doctrine, argues that the prevailing interpretation by lower courts is misguided, and proposes a new framework for analyzing broader scheme questions. The analysis reveals that lower courts have upheld noncommercial activity by mistakenly relying on Wickard v. Filburn in their interpretation of the broader scheme doctrine. Instead, the broader scheme doctrine finds its roots in cases like Maryland v. Wirtz and Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Association. I propose a new framework for analyzing broader scheme questions based on the Wirtz and Hodel enterprise theory. This framework adheres to Lopez's substantive limits against federal regulation of purely local, noncommercial activity by permitting Congress to regulate noncommercial activity only when performed as part of an economic enterprise.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Keywords: Commerce clause, constitutional law, broader scheme

JEL Classification: K19, K10

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 22, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Kreit, Alex, Why is Congress Still Regulating Noncommercial Activity?. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 28. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=555926

Contact Information

Alex Kreit (Contact Author)
Thomas Jefferson School of Law ( email )
1155 Island Ave
San Diego, CA 92101
United States
619-961-4265 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,039
Downloads: 173
Download Rank: 96,703
Footnotes:  197

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.312 seconds