|
||||
|
||||
Implications of Alternative Operational Risk Modeling TechniquesPatrick De FontnouvelleFederal Reserve Bank of Boston - Supervision and Regulation Eric S. RosengrenFederal Reserve Bank of Boston - Supervision and Regulation John S. JordanFitchRisk June 2004 Abstract: Quantification of operational risk has received increased attention with the inclusion of an explicit capital charge for operational risk under the new Basle proposal. The proposal provides significant flexibility for banks to use internal models to estimate their operational risk, and the associated capital needed for unexpected losses. Most banks have used variants of value at risk models that estimate frequency, severity, and loss distributions. This paper examines the empirical regularities in operational loss data. Using loss data from six large internationally active banking institutions, we find that loss data by event types are quite similar across institutions. Furthermore, our results are consistent with economic capital numbers disclosed by some large banks, and also with the results of studies modeling losses using publicly available "external" loss data.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 45 working papers seriesDate posted: June 20, 2004Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.437 seconds