Abstract

 
 

Citations (10)



 
 

Footnotes (57)



 


 



A New Dynamism in the Public Domain


Robert P. Merges


University of California, Berkeley - School of Law


University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 71, pp. 183-203, 2004

Abstract:     
Many believe intellectual property has overreached, and that policymakers must respond. In this essay, I argue that the critique may have merit, but private parties are in some cases taking matters into their own hands. Firms and individuals are increasingly injecting information into the public domain with the explicit goal of preempting or undermining the potential property rights of economic adversaries. Biotechnology firms invest millions of dollars in public domain gene sequence databases, to prevent hold-ups by firms with patents on short gene sequences. Major software firms fight entrenched rivals by investing millions of dollars, contributing to open source operating systems. In both cases, property-preempting investments (PPI's) are made to offset the effects of competitors' property rights. Individuals and nonprofits are joining in too, with initiatives such as the Creative Commons project. All of these major private investments in the public domain reveal a self-correcting feature of the intellectual property system that has been overlooked until now, and signal that public lawmaking is not the only arena in which the excesses of intellectual property may be addressed.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 25, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Merges, Robert P., A New Dynamism in the Public Domain. University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 71, pp. 183-203, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=558751

Contact Information

Robert P. Merges (Contact Author)
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )
Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
510-643-6199 (Phone)
510-643-6171 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,972
Downloads: 661
Download Rank: 17,354
Citations:  10
Footnotes:  57

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.328 seconds