Abstract

 
 

References (36)



 
 

Citations (3)



 


 



Intellectual Property Law and the Boundaries of the Firm


Oren Bar-Gill


New York University School of Law

Gideon Parchomovsky


University of Pennsylvania Law School; Bar Ilan University - Faculty of Law

June 24, 2004

U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper 04-19; Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 480

Abstract:     
Arrow's disclosure paradox implies that information that is not afforded legal protection cannot be bought or sold on the market. This paper emphasizes the important relationship between the paradox of disclosure and the boundaries of the firm question. Only legally protected inventions, i.e., patented inventions, may be traded; pre-patent stages of the innovation process may not. Consequently, by force of law, rather than by the guidance of economic principle, pre-patent innovation must be carried out within the boundaries of a single firm.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: Boundaries of the firm, disclosure paradox, intellectual property law

JEL Classification: D23, K11, L22

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 29, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Bar-Gill, Oren and Parchomovsky, Gideon, Intellectual Property Law and the Boundaries of the Firm (June 24, 2004). U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper 04-19; Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 480. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=559195 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.559195

Contact Information

Oren Bar-Gill (Contact Author)
New York University School of Law ( email )
40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
212-998-6222 (Phone)
212-995-4590 (Fax)
Gideon Parchomovsky
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
215-898-1603 (Phone)
Bar Ilan University - Faculty of Law ( email )
Ramat Gan 52900
Israel
972-2-5317078 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,085
Downloads: 400
Download Rank: 17,239
References:  36
Citations:  3

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.969 seconds