Abstract

 
 

References (32)



 


 



How Do Institutional Investors Trade


Paul G.J. O'Connell


FDO Partners, LLC

Melvyn Teo


Singapore Management University - School of Business

March 2004

EFA 2004 Maastricht Meetings Paper No. 1751

Abstract:     
Using a novel and detailed custody trades dataset, this paper analyzes the trading behavior of institutions. Extant studies have examined the effects of past performance on trading by retail investors, day traders, and futures floor traders. Yet very little work has been done on institutions. We find that unlike other investors, institutions take on more risk following an increase in net profit and loss. However, the responses to a gain and loss are highly asymmetric. Institutions aggressively reduce risk in the wake of losses, but only mildly increase risk in the wake of gains. This asymmetry is more pronounced for experienced and older funds. Further, the performance dependence varies over the calendar year, and manifests itself at the security but not at the portfolio level. We relate these findings to the behavioral theories of narrow framing, dynamic loss aversion, and overconfidence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 42

Keywords: Institutional investors, overconfidence, loss aversion

JEL Classification: G10, G11

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 1, 2004  

Suggested Citation

O'Connell, Paul G.J. and Teo, Melvyn, How Do Institutional Investors Trade (March 2004). EFA 2004 Maastricht Meetings Paper No. 1751. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=559414 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.559414

Contact Information

Paul G.J. O'Connell
FDO Partners, LLC ( email )
5 Revere Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-864-3364 (Phone)
617-864-5548 (Fax)
Melvyn Teo (Contact Author)
Singapore Management University - School of Business ( email )
50 Stamford Road
Singapore, 178899
Singapore
+65 6828 0735 (Phone)
+65 6822 0777 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,229
Downloads: 525
Download Rank: 24,182
References:  32

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.500 seconds