Least Cost Avoidance: The Tragedy of Common Safety
University of Amsterdam - Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics (ACLE); Tinbergen Institute
Nuno M. Garoupa
Texas A&M University School of Law; Catholic University of Portugal (UCP) - Católica Global School of Law
Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Forthcoming
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 04-27
This paper shows that the least cost avoider approach in tort is not necessarily the optimal way to attain least cost avoidance when accidents can be avoided by either of two parties. When parties do not observe each other's costs of care at the time of the accident and are unable to determine which party is the least cost avoider, they fail to anticipate the outcome of the adjudication. Under these circumstances, accident avoidance becomes a commons problem because care by each individual party reduces the prospect of liability for both parties. As a result parties suboptimally invest in care. We show that regulation removes this problem and is superior to tort liability both when parties act simultaneously and when they act sequentially. We further examine how different liability rules perform in this respect.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 42
Keywords: tort, fine, precaution cost liability, last clear chance, least cost avoider
JEL Classification: K13, K32
Date posted: June 29, 2004 ; Last revised: April 7, 2011
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds