Citations (1)



The Cultural War Over Reparations for Slavery

Alfred L. Brophy

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law

DePaul Law Review, Vol. 53, pp. 1181-1213, 2004

"The Cultural War Over Reparations" maps the differences in perspectives on reparations between supporters and skeptics. It asks why there is a difference in support for reparations among blacks and whites. What is it about reparations that makes them so controversial? It then assesses the goals of reparationists, such as apologies and truth commissions, accounting for past wrongs, and addressing those wrongs through programs of community empowerment. Then it turns to the reparations skeptics' arguments. There are four key groups of arguments against reparations: There is no moral or legal liability; compensation has already been made; reparations are unworkable or not politically practicable; and reparations are divisive, which is at the center of the cultural war. The essay suggests that there may be further accounting of past injustices, but that compensation is, perhaps, unattainable, at least in the near term.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: Reparations, slavery, Jim Crow, culture war

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 6, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Brophy, Alfred L., The Cultural War Over Reparations for Slavery. DePaul Law Review, Vol. 53, pp. 1181-1213, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=561441

Contact Information

Alfred L. Brophy (Contact Author)
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law ( email )
Van Hecke-Wettach Hall, 160 Ridge Road
CB #3380
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380
United States
919-962-4128 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 6,526
Downloads: 921
Download Rank: 17,363
Citations:  1

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.234 seconds