The Cultural War Over Reparations for Slavery
Alfred L. Brophy
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - School of Law; University of Alabama - School of Law
DePaul Law Review, Vol. 53, pp. 1181-1213, 2004
"The Cultural War Over Reparations" maps the differences in perspectives on reparations between supporters and skeptics. It asks why there is a difference in support for reparations among blacks and whites. What is it about reparations that makes them so controversial? It then assesses the goals of reparationists, such as apologies and truth commissions, accounting for past wrongs, and addressing those wrongs through programs of community empowerment. Then it turns to the reparations skeptics' arguments. There are four key groups of arguments against reparations: There is no moral or legal liability; compensation has already been made; reparations are unworkable or not politically practicable; and reparations are divisive, which is at the center of the cultural war. The essay suggests that there may be further accounting of past injustices, but that compensation is, perhaps, unattainable, at least in the near term.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34
Keywords: Reparations, slavery, Jim Crow, culture war
Date posted: July 6, 2004
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.218 seconds