Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=567001
 


 



Addressing the Problem of Impatient, Impulsive and Other Imperfect Actors in 401(k) Plans


Amy Monahan


University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - School of Law


Virginia Tax Review, Vol. 23, p. 471, 2004

Abstract:     
Neoclassical economists argue that the 401(k) plan is superior to the defined benefit pension plan as a retirement savings vehicle precisely because it gives an individual the freedom necessary to make rational decisions which maximize his or her welfare. This article argues that many individuals do not, contrary to the assumptions made by neoclassical economic theory, behave rationally when making savings decisions within 401(k) plans. The article begins by identifying two common types of imperfect actors, the impatient and the impulsive, and describing the behavioral characteristics common to each. Relying on several studies of savings behavior in 401(k) plans, the author describes four common mistakes that imperfect actors are likely to make in 401(k) plans that may endanger their retirement wealth. The author then proposes a multi-part legislative solution to the common problems identified, in order to better protect imperfect actors in 401(k) plans. The author has structured her reform proposal in a way that protects imperfect actors, while not interfering with the choices available to those who make rational decisions. Because rational actors are largely unaffected by the reform proposals, the author argues that her reforms, although paternalistic, are economically efficient.

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: July 21, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Monahan, Amy, Addressing the Problem of Impatient, Impulsive and Other Imperfect Actors in 401(k) Plans. Virginia Tax Review, Vol. 23, p. 471, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=567001

Contact Information

Amy Monahan (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - School of Law ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,003

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.234 seconds