|
||||
|
||||
The Parking Lot Problem
Maria N. Arbatskaya Emory University Kaushik Mukhopadhaya Emory University - Department of Economics Eric Bennett Rasmusen Indiana University Bloomington - Department of Business Economics & Public Policy December 19, 2006 Abstract: Competition for access to an underpriced good such as a free parking spot can eat up its entire surplus, eliminating the social value of the good. There is a discontinuity in social welfare between enough and not enough, with the minimum social welfare at slightly too small a parking lot because of the rent-seeking efforts of drivers. Full rent dissipation occurs only when drivers have identical preferences, but allowing for heterogeneous preferences does not alter the conclusion that the welfare losses from undercapacity and overcapacity are asymmetric and that parking lots should be overbuilt. Furthermore, when it is chosen optimally under uncertainty, the parking lot size will be well in excess of mean demand, and may even be chosen to accommodate all potential drivers. Uncertainty over the number of drivers, which is detrimental in the first-best, actually increases social welfare if the parking lot size is too small.
Keywords: rent-seeking, all-pay auction, timing game, capacity size, queue. JEL Classifications: R4, L91, D72, C7 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: August 02, 2004 ; Last revised: May 24, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo4 in 0.140 seconds.