|
||||
|
||||
An Empirically-Based Taxonomy of Dutch Manufacturing: Innovation Policy ImplicationsFranz C. PalmUniversity of Maastricht - Department of Economics; CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research) Wladimir RaymondUniversity of Maastricht Pierre MohnenMaastricht University - UNU-MERIT Sybrand Schim Van der LoeffUniversity of Maastricht July 2004 CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1230 Abstract: The paper studies the degree of homogeneity of innovative behavior in order to determine empirically an industry classification of Dutch manufacturing that can be used for policy purposes. We use a two limit tobit model with sample selection, which explains the decisions by business enterprises to innovate and the impact these decisions have on the share of innovative sales. The model is estimated for eleven industries based on the Dutch Standard Industrial Classification (SBI 1993). A likelihood ratio test (LR) is then performed to test for equality of the parameters across industries. We find that Dutch manufacturing consists of three groups of industries in terms of innovative behavior, a hightech group, a low-tech group and the industry of wood, where firms seem to have a rather different innovative behavior from the remaining industries. The same pattern shows up in the three Dutch Community Innovation Surveys.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 43 Keywords: generalized tobit, high-tech industry, homogeneity, innovation policy, likelihood ratio test, model of friction, sample selection, two-limit tobit model, TPP innovator JEL Classification: C34, C51, O33, O38 working papers seriesDate posted: August 4, 2004Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.516 seconds