Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=573184
 
 

Citations (3)



 
 

Footnotes (35)



 


 



An Analysis of the Approach of the European, Japanese and United States Patent Offices to Patenting Partial DNA Sequences (ESTs)


Melanie J. Howlett


Melbourne Law School

Andrew F. Christie


Melbourne Law School

2004

International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright, Vol. 34, pp. 581-602, 2003

Abstract:     
Rapid developments in biotechnology are challenging the boundary of patent law. The scientific community, national and international organisations are concerned about the patenting of partial DNA sequences (also called expressed sequence tags (ESTs)) and the need to ensure a fair allocation of intellectual property rights. This paper provides a detailed analysis of the examination practices of the European, Japanese and United States Patent Offices in relation to patenting ESTs. This analysis illustrates that the practice of the patent offices is such that the requirements for patentability of ESTs is stringent. The main concerns, that (i) offices would grant patents for ESTs with no useful function, and that (ii) patents would be granted for cDNA sequences that comprise the sequence of an EST and thus are so broad as to include the subsequently discovered corresponding gene, appear unfounded.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: intellectual property, patent, DNA, partial DNA sequences, ESTS, United States, Europe, Japan, Patent Office

JEL Classification: K1, K11, K19, K3

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 6, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Howlett, Melanie J. and Christie, Andrew F., An Analysis of the Approach of the European, Japanese and United States Patent Offices to Patenting Partial DNA Sequences (ESTs) (2004). International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright, Vol. 34, pp. 581-602, 2003. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=573184

Contact Information

Melanie J. Howlett
Melbourne Law School ( email )
Victoria, 3010
Australia
Andrew F. Christie (Contact Author)
Melbourne Law School ( email )
University of Melbourne
Melbourne, Victoria 3010
Australia
HOME PAGE: http://www.andrewchristie.com
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,830
Downloads: 328
Download Rank: 51,424
Citations:  3
Footnotes:  35

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.407 seconds