Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=573881
 
 

Footnotes (77)



 


 



Copyright Protection for Perfumes


Thomas G. Field Jr.


University of New Hampshire School of Law (formerly Franklin Pierce Law Center)

November 6, 2004

IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 45, p. 19, 2004

Abstract:     
In June 2004, the Lancome opinion from the Netherlands held that perfume compositions are copyrightable. The thesis of this paper is that the Dutch Court's approach runs afoul of basic copyright principles. Protecting scents instead would be relatively novel, but hardly radical, and necessary adaptations to copyright law would be modest. The paper nevertheless concludes that, lacking evidence of need, judges should not be quick to expand copyright law and should await legislative action.

[An English translation of the Dutch opinion by Annemarie Louise Margot (Dooijes) Field, the author's daughter-in-law, follows at 31.]

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: Copyright, patent, trade secret, perfume, Dutch

JEL Classification: K20, K40

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 9, 2004 ; Last revised: October 21, 2010

Suggested Citation

Field, Thomas G., Copyright Protection for Perfumes (November 6, 2004). IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 45, p. 19, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=573881 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.573881

Contact Information

Thomas G. Field Jr. (Contact Author)
University of New Hampshire School of Law ( email )
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,145
Downloads: 257
Download Rank: 66,898
Footnotes:  77

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.281 seconds