Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=577121
 
 

Footnotes (31)



 


 



Why are There Four Hegelian Judgments?


David Gray Carlson


Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law


Cardozo Journal of Law, Policy and Ethics, Vol. 2, 2005

Abstract:     
Hegel is the philosopher of threes. His entire system is triune: logic-nature-spirit. Within the logic is a triune structure: being, essence, notion. Within notion there is a triad: subject-object-idea. Within subjectivity, there is a triad: notion, judgment, syllogism. Yet when we examine Hegel's critique of judgment, there are four (not three): inherence-reflection-necessity-notion.

This paper tries to explain why this is so. There is a disturbing element present at all times in Hegel's logic - what Slavoj Zizek named a silent fourth, which erupts and manifests itself in judgment. This paper refines and justifies Zizek's insight, arguing from the text of Hegel's monumental "Science of Logic".

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: Hegel, judgment, philosophy, jurisprudence, reflection

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 17, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Carlson, David Gray, Why are There Four Hegelian Judgments?. Cardozo Journal of Law, Policy and Ethics, Vol. 2, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=577121

Contact Information

David Gray Carlson (Contact Author)
Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )
55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States
212-790-0210 (Phone)
212-790-0205 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,816
Downloads: 290
Download Rank: 59,090
Footnotes:  31

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.250 seconds