Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=577264
 
 

Footnotes (206)



 


 



The Quasi War Cases—And Their Relevance to Whether Letters of Marque and Reprisal Constrain Presidential War Powers


Gregory Sidak


Tilburg Law & Economics Center (TILEC), Tilburg University; Criterion Economics, L.L.C.


Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 465-500, Spring 2005

Abstract:     
Constitutional scholars cite three Supreme Court decisions arising from the undeclared Quasi War with France in 1798-1800 as support for the proposition that Congress may authorize war of any magnitude, and that, except in case of sudden or imminent attack on the United States, this congressional authority displaces any right of the President to use military force of even modest magnitude without prior congressional authorization. The textual hook claimed by these scholars for so reading Bas v. Tingy, Talbot v. Seeman, and Little v. Bareme is the phrase in Article I, section 8 of the Constitution that immediately follows the grant to Congress of the power To declare War - namely, the power to grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water. These additional words, it is argued, enable Congress to regulate the President's ability to use military force in a manner short of full-scale war. This prevailing interpretation of the Quasi War cases is incorrect and has special significance because the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit gave it credence in 2000 in the war powers case Campbell v. Clinton and because one or more of the cases continues to be cited in litigation concerning the current war on terror.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 37

Keywords: Declaration of war, marque, reprisal, capture, prize, Quasi War, Bas, Talbot, Bareme

JEL Classification: K10, N00, N41, N71, N81

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 17, 2004 ; Last revised: November 2, 2009

Suggested Citation

Sidak, Gregory, The Quasi War Cases—And Their Relevance to Whether Letters of Marque and Reprisal Constrain Presidential War Powers. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 465-500, Spring 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=577264 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.577264

Contact Information

J. Gregory Sidak (Contact Author)
Tilburg Law & Economics Center (TILEC), Tilburg University ( email )
Tilburg, 5000 LE
Netherlands
Criterion Economics, L.L.C. ( email )
1614 20th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20009
United States
(202) 518-5121 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.criterioneconomics.com
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,694
Downloads: 228
Download Rank: 73,609
Footnotes:  206

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.359 seconds