Against Chevron - A 'Modest Proposal'

William R. Andersen

University of Washington School of Law

Administrative Law Review, December 2004

Convinced that the endless permutations and subtleties of the Chevron doctrine - so beloved by the professoriat - produce little but confusion for students, practitioners and judges, the author suggests a short amendment to section 706 of the Administrative Procedure Act to put the difficult problem of weighting agency legal interpretations on a sounder and more predictable footing. Shifting sharply from a formal to a more functional approach, the amendment would represent a legislative instruction to the court to defer to agency legal interpretations (no matter their form) to the extent there is a plausible empirical showing that the conditions for deference are present. The conditions listed in the amendment (and proposals to add other empirical conditions are invited) include considerations of the authority of the agency's interpretation, what it owes to special agency technical or political resources, how carefully it was produced, and whether there has been a showing of the need for an independent judicial voice on the question.

Keywords: Judicial deference to agency legal interpretations, Chevron doctrine

Accepted Paper Series

Not Available For Download

Date posted: August 22, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Andersen, William R., Against Chevron - A 'Modest Proposal'. Administrative Law Review, December 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=579281

Contact Information

William R. Andersen (Contact Author)
University of Washington School of Law ( email )
William H. Gates Hall
Box 353020
Seattle, WA 98105-3020
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 602

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.391 seconds