Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=584741
 
 

Footnotes (123)



 


 



The Cost of Conscience: Quantifying our Charitable Burden in an Era of Globalization


Frank A. Pasquale III


University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law; Yale University - Yale Information Society Project

August 29, 2004

Seton Hall Public Law Research Paper No. 15

Abstract:     
Development economists have long debated the proper targets for foreign aid contributions from wealthy countries. Philosophers like Peter Singer and Peter Unger now suggest that these countries' citizens have a parallel moral responsibility to tithe a portion of their income directly for the relief of the suffering of the poorest. These thinkers would prefer a systematic global redistribution of income - some public mechanism for accomplishing worldwide what the tax systems of egalitarian social democratic states accomplish. But they all realize that such global governance is unlikely to come about in any of our lifetimes. So they turn their attention to individuals, arguing that giving more to the poor is necessary and not simply supererogatory (i.e., something beyond duty that it would be especially admirable to do.).

Unfortunately, both Singer and Unger avoid many of the hardest questions their approaches suggest. Neither convincingly draws a line between necessity, convenience, and luxury - essential distinctions for those urging others to rethink their unnecessary consumption. By failing to concretize their ethical arguments, they leave themselves vulnerable to attacks by pragmatists who find their worldviews absurdly demanding.

A clearer theory of the ethics of consumption may help save tithing ethics from pragmatist critiques. An ethic of consumption and charity - based on either religious or secular humanist traditions - would give their ideas real weight and force. There is some middle ground between the saintly rigor of a Mother Teresa and the unreflective materialism so common in developed countries. The financial health of NGO's, and the fate of poverty relief generally, depends on the ability of the well-off to adopt such an ethic.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 49

Keywords: charity, economics, health, development

JEL Classification: A11,O10, Z10

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 30, 2004  

Suggested Citation

Pasquale, Frank A., The Cost of Conscience: Quantifying our Charitable Burden in an Era of Globalization (August 29, 2004). Seton Hall Public Law Research Paper No. 15. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=584741 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.584741

Contact Information

Frank A. Pasquale III (Contact Author)
University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law ( email )
500 West Baltimore Street
Baltimore, MD 21201-1786
United States
410-706-4820 (Phone)
410-706-0407 (Fax)
Yale University - Yale Information Society Project ( email )
127 Wall Street
New Haven, CT 06511
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,230
Downloads: 218
Download Rank: 77,191
Footnotes:  123

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 1.250 seconds